S 1666 - Magnesia ad Maeandrum (types of Alexander the Great), silver, drachms (225-200 BCE)

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page : 10793


225 BCE - 200 BCE Silver 451 kg

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Head of Herakles right, wearing lion skin
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: AΛΕΞΑΝΔPOY (Greek).Zeus Aëtophoros seated left, two monograms in left field, maeander pattern in exergue
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Magnesia ad Maeandrum Ancient regionAncient region.: Ionia Modern countryModern country: Turkey AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: Alexander III the Great (Argead king, 336-323 BC)
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 225 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 200 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Silver Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 4.25 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: drachma Nomisma.org StandardStandard.: Attic
Image
S 1666 - Magnesia ad Maeandrum (types of Alexander the Great), silver, drachms (225-200 BCE).jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: Vădan 20181Vădan 2018, p. 102-103 (Group 2)
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution.  Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 1 25 1 9.09 10
2 1 25 2 18.18 7
3 1 25 3 27.27 8
5 1 25 5 45.45 9
Total 4 of 4 100 11 of 11 99.99
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available


Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) 4 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins.  1
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 9 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 11
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 2.75 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 1.22
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 2.25 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1)  25 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983  5.3 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000.  106,000
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011  (O) 6.29 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000.  0.00010
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O)  (o = % of O) 90.91% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000.  4,150.94
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum)  451 kg <br /> 451 kg Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000.  10,377.36
Remarks

Die study done by Philip Kinns

References

  1. ^  Vădan, Paul (2018), "The Posthumous Alexander Tetradrachms of Magnesia on the Maeander", American Journal of Numismatics, 30, p. 45-106.