S 1962 - Ephesus, silver, didrachms (395-385 BCE) Kinns

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page : 13476


395 BCE - 385 BCE Silver 1,057 kg

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Ε-Φ flanking (Greek).Xeines, magistrate. Bee with slightly curved wings seen from above
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: ΞΕΙΝΗΣ downward to right (Greek).Forepart of stag to right with head reverted, palm tree to left
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Ephesus Ancient regionAncient region.: Ionia Modern countryModern country: Turkey AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 395 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 385 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Classical 480-323 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Silver Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 7.40 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: didrachm Nomisma.org StandardStandard.: Chian
Image
S1962 Ephesus didrachms.jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: Ashton - Kinns - Konuk - Meadows 20021Ashton - Kinns - Konuk - Meadows 2002, p. 102
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution.  Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 2 40 2 16.67 2, 5
3 2 40 6 50 3, 4
4 1 20 4 33.33 1
Total 5 of 5 100 12 of 12 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available


Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) 5 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins.  2
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 6 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 12
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 2.4 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 2
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 1.2 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1)  40 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983  7.14 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000.  142,800
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011  (O) 8.57 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000.  0.00008
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O)  (o = % of O) 83.33% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000.  3,361.34
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum)  1,057 kg <br /> 1,057 kg Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000.  8,403.36
Remarks

Most likely one single workstation

References

  1. ^  Ashton, Richard - Kinns, Philip - Konuk, Koray - Meadows, Andrew (2002), "The Hecatomnus Hoard (CH 5.17, 8.96, 9.387)", Coin Hoards, IX, London, p. 95-158