S 829 - Tiberias, bronze, dupondius (1), 30-31 BC

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page : 9216


30 - 31 Bronze

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: TIBEPIAC (Greek).
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: HPWΔOY TETPAPXOY (Greek).
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Tiberias Ancient regionAncient region.: Galilee Modern countryModern country: Israel AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: Herod Antipas (tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, 4 BC-39 AD), Tiberius (Roman emperor, 14-37 AD)
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 30 toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 31 PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Roman from 30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze Nomisma.org DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: dupondius (1) StandardStandard.:
Average weightAverage of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams).:
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille1A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille, The Coinage of Herod Antipas: A Study and Die Classification of the Earliest Coins of Galilee, Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 102). Foreword by C. Lorber, Leiden-Boston, 2018 (série D, type n° 10, dénomination I).
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution.  Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
2 1 33.33 2 5
17 1 33.33 17 42.5
21 1 33.33 21 52.5
Total 3 of 3 99.99 40 of 40 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available


Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) 3 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. 
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 17 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 40
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 13.33 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 2.35
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 5.67 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1)  %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983  2.98 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000.  59,600
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011  (O) 3.24 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000.  0.00067
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O)  (o = % of O) % Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000.  26,845.64
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum)  n.a. Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000.  67,114.09
Remarks


References

  1. ^ A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille