Caulonia, silver, staters (480-388 BCE): Difference between revisions
From SILVER
(Distribution6) |
(Distribution7) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|Number of dies=7 | |Number of dies=7 | ||
|Die name=80,99,105,119,156,164,178 | |Die name=80,99,105,119,156,164,178 | ||
}} | |||
{{Distribution Item | |||
|Frequency=7 | |||
|Number of dies=4 | |||
|Die name=121,124,127,148 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:27, 21 October 2022
480 - 388 Silver 12,520 kg
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | KAYΛ (Greek). |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Caulonia | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Bruttium | Modern countryModern country: Italy | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 480 | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 388 | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Classical 480-323 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Silver
|
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | stater
|
StandardStandard.: | |
| Mode weightMode of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams).: | 7,8-99<ul><li>No units of measurement were declared for this property.</li> <!--br--><li>",8-99" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.</li></ul> |
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | S. P. Noe1S. P. Noe, The coinage of Caulonia, NS 9, New York, 1958, n° 62-181. | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | |||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 2.91 | 79, 87, 94, 95, 107, 116, 117, 118, 125, 126, 134, 136, 139, 152, 165 |
| 2 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 3.49 | 85, 130, 140, 147, 157, 167, 168, 176, 181 |
| 3 | 5 | 6.67 | 15 | 2.91 | 65, 72, 112, 137, 177 |
| 4 | 7 | 9.33 | 28 | 5.43 | 64, 83, 100, 102, 135, 150, 169 |
| 5 | 4 | 5.33 | 20 | 3.88 | 96, 97, 141, 142 |
| 6 | 7 | 9.33 | 42 | 8.14 | 80, 99, 105, 119, 156, 164, 178 |
| 7 | 4 | 5.33 | 28 | 5.43 | 121, 124, 127, 148 |
| 8 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 4.65 | 113, 151, 153 |
| 9 | 2 | 2.67 | 18 | 3.49 | 62;104 |
| 10 | 6 | 8 | 60 | 11.63 | 78, 81, 110, 143, 155, 159 |
| 11 | 2 | 2.67 | 22 | 4.26 | 84, 162 |
| 13 | 1 | 1.33 | 13 | 2.52 | 131 |
| 14 | 3 | 4 | 42 | 8.14 | 76, 91, 173 |
| 16 | 3 | 4 | 48 | 9.3 | 73, 108, 170 |
| 23 | 1 | 1.33 | 23 | 4.46 | 88 |
| 30 | 1 | 1.33 | 30 | 5.81 | 93 |
| 34 | 1 | 1.33 | 34 | 6.59 | 179 |
| 36 | 1 | 1.33 | 36 | 6.98 | 66 |
| Total | 75 of 75 | 99.98 | 516 of 516 | 100.02 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 75 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 15 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | NC"NC" is not a number. | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 513 |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 6.84 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 20 % | |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 79.3 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 1,586,000 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 87.84 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00033 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 97.08% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 12,938.21 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | 0 kg <br /> 12,520 kg | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 32,345.52 |
Remarks
References
- ^ S. P. Noe
