S 153 - Eusebeia/Mazaka? (Ariarathes VI-VII), silver, tetradrachms (Antiochus VII) (130-100 BCE): Difference between revisions
From SILVER
(Distribution30) |
(Distribution31) |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
{{Distribution Item | {{Distribution Item | ||
|Frequency=30 | |Frequency=30 | ||
|Number of dies=1 | |||
}} | |||
{{Distribution Item | |||
|Frequency=31 | |||
|Number of dies=1 | |Number of dies=1 | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:32, 21 October 2022
Silver 19,439 kg
Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | |
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | BAΣΙΛΕΩΣ ANTIOXΟΥ EYEPΓETOY (Greek). |
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Uncertain mint (mint II) | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Modern countryModern country: | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Antiochus VII Euergetes (Seleucid king, 138-129 BC) |
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC |
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Silver | DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | tetradrachm | StandardStandard.: |
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: | El. Krengel et C. C. Lorber1 | ||
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: |
Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
1 | 5 | 8.62 | 5 | 0.8 | 18, 20, 32, 34, 38 |
2 | 10 | 17.24 | 20 | 3.21 | 22, 33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 54, 56, 57, 58 |
3 | 8 | 13.79 | 24 | 3.85 | 2, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 49, 50 |
4 | 7 | 12.07 | 28 | 4.49 | 9, 21, 23, 28, 30, 43, 46 |
5 | 2 | 3.45 | 10 | 1.6 | 31, 48 |
6 | 2 | 3.45 | 12 | 1.92 | 3, 35 |
7 | 3 | 5.17 | 21 | 3.37 | 16, 24, 51 |
8 | 2 | 3.45 | 16 | 2.56 | 11, 25 |
9 | 4 | 6.9 | 36 | 5.77 | 1, 10, 15, 27 |
10 | 3 | 5.17 | 30 | 4.81 | 6, 8, 12 |
11 | 1 | 1.72 | 11 | 1.76 | 45 |
13 | 2 | 3.45 | 26 | 4.17 | 4, 42 |
18 | 1 | 1.72 | 18 | 2.88 | 55 |
19 | 1 | 1.72 | 19 | 3.04 | 41 |
25 | 1 | 1.72 | 25 | 4.01 | 26 |
30 | 1 | 1.72 | 30 | 4.81 | 52 |
31 | 1 | 1.72 | 31 | 4.97 | 44 |
52 | 1 | 1.72 | 52 | 8.33 | 47 |
56 | 1 | 1.72 | 56 | 8.97 | 29 |
61 | 1 | 1.72 | 61 | 9.78 | 14 |
93 | 1 | 1.72 | 93 | 14.9 | 53 |
Total | 58 of 58 | 99.96 | 624 of 624 | 100 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 58 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 5 |
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 156 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 624 |
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 10.76 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 4 |
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 2.69 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 8.62 % |
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 58.55 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 1,171,000 |
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 63.94 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00053 |
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 99.2% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 21,315.12 |
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | 0 kg <br /> 19,439 kg | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 53,287.79 |
Remarks
References
- ^ El. Krengel et C. C. Lorber