AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 105 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 105 BCE
Hellenistic 323-30 BCperiodTime period of the numismatic object.
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Silver
WeightWeight of the numismatic object (in grams).in grams: 2.982.98 g <br />2,980 mg <br />
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: denarius
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 109 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 108 BCE
Hellenistic 323-30 BCperiodTime period of the numismatic object.
Physical description
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.ᵖ:
"Overstruck on a denarius of L. Flaminius Chilo (Cr. 302/1) [...] On this specimen the name L. Flaminius Chilo (Crawford 302/1) is clearly visible at three o’clock on the obverse. This overstrike is not listed by Crawford in his table XVIII (pp. 116-117). It is interesting that the Chilo coin was overstruck only 4 years after initially being struck. Perhaps overstriking was more common under the Republic than previously thought, but the undertype was normally obliterated."
References
^Sydenham, Edward Allen (1952), The Coinage of the Roman Republic, London, Spink & Son Ltd., lxix, 343 p., 30 pl.
abCrawford, Michael H. (1974), Roman Republican Coinage, Cambridge
periodTime period of the numismatic object.
