335 BCE - 325 BCEΕΡΒΕΣΣΙΝΩΝ
Overstriking coin
2609_-_Herbessus_(AE_Sikelia-eagle).png
Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.:
|
ΕΡΒΕΣΣΙΝΩΝ (Greek) Head of Sikelia right, wearing olive-leaves wreath. Linear border.
|
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.:
|
Snake right and eagle standing right, head reverted. Border of dots.
|
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.:
|
Herbessus
|
Ancient regionAncient region.
|
Sicily
|
Modern countryModern country: Italy
|
AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
|
|
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 335 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 325 BCE
|
Classical 480-323 BC periodTime period of the numismatic object.
|
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze
|
|
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: denomination A/B
|
|
|
|
References
Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.:
|
ΖΕΥΣ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΟΣ (Greek) Head of Zeus Eleutherios left, wearing laurel wreath
|
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.:
|
ΣΥΡΑΚΟΣΙΩΝ (Greek) Horse galloping left
|
Mint and issuing power
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 339 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 334 BCE
|
Classical 480-323 BC periodTime period of the numismatic object.
|
Physical description
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius. ᵖ:
|
denomination AA
|
|
|
References
Frequency of overstrikesFrequency of overstrikes:
|
|
Level of confidenceLevel of confidence of the identification:
|
|
RemarksRemarks:
|
"I can not understand why this happend so often on such an rare issue. To position them so on purpose does not make sense, why should they do so. If they go for appearance they could have use the time better to make their own planchets or to remove the details from undertype. Edit, forgot to mention that the undertype coins always has the same die axis and Position on obverse and reverse to the overstruck coins which is impossible. That would mean that the understruck coins were always struck at same die axis and same centering. My question is are they all fake except the authentic host? I know already that some have to be fake, sold by fake sellers with typlical shinny patina." David MacDonald
|
References
- ^ Calciati, Romolo (1987), Corpus nummorum siculorum. La monetazione di bronzo/The bronze coinage, vol. 3, Milan, Edizioni G. M.
- ^ Campana, Alberto (1992-2003), Corpus Nummorum Antiquae Italiae, Panorama Numismatico
- a b Hoover, Oliver D. (2012), The Handbook of Greek Coinage Series. 2. Handbook of the Coins of Sicily (Including Lipara). Civic, Royal, Siculo-Punic, and Romano-Sicilian Issues. Sixth to First Centuries BC, Lancaster-London, 489 p.
- ^ Calciati, Romolo (1986), Corpus nummorum siculorum. La monetazione di bronzo/The bronze coinage, vol. 2, Milan, Edizioni G. M.
- ^ Puglisi, Mariangela (2009), La Sicilia da Dionisio I a Sesto Pompeo : circolazione e funzione della moneta, Messina, DiScAM, p. 519.