Antioch (Demetrius II), silver, tetradrachms (129-128 BCE) Houghton
From SILVER
129 BCE - 128 BCE Silver 4,202 kg
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | Diademed and bearded head right |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | BAΣIΛEΩΣ ΔHMHTPIOY ΘEOY NIKA-TOPOΣ (Greek).Zeus Nikephoros seated left, Ξ to outer left, O below throne |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Antioch | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Syria | Modern countryModern country: Turkey | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Demetrius II Nicator (Seleucid king, 145-140 and 129-125 BC), Seleucid Dynasty (312-63 BC) |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 129 BCE | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 128 BCE | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Silver
|
Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams | 16.70 | DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | tetradrachm
|
StandardStandard.: | Attic |
Image
S2035 Antioch Demetrius II 129 128.jpg [1]
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | Houghton 19911Houghton 1991, p. 94-95 (Table 7) | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | Sear II2Sear II, n° 7102, SC II3SC II, n° 2166, HGC 94HGC 9, n° 1117 | ||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 2 | 16.67 | 2 | 2.27 | 10, 12 |
| 2 | 3 | 25 | 6 | 6.82 | 1, 4, 9 |
| 4 | 1 | 8.33 | 4 | 4.55 | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | 8.33 | 8 | 9.09 | 11 |
| 10 | 1 | 8.33 | 10 | 11.36 | 6 |
| 11 | 2 | 16.67 | 22 | 25 | 2, 5 |
| 12 | 1 | 8.33 | 12 | 13.64 | 7 |
| 24 | 1 | 8.33 | 24 | 27.27 | 8 |
| Total | 12 of 12 | 99.99 | 88 of 88 | 100 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 12 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 2 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 88 | |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 7.33 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 16.67 % | |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 12.58 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 251,600 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 13.89 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00035 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 97.73% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 13,990.46 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | 4,202 kg <br /> 4,202 kg | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 34,976.15 |
Remarks
Most likely more than 2 workstations
